| 翻訳と辞書 |
| Video Camera Surveillance (Temporary Measures) Act 2011 ： ウィキペディア英語版 |
Video Camera Surveillance (Temporary Measures) Act 2011
The Video Camera Surveillance (Temporary Measures) Act 2011 is an Act of Parliament passed in New Zealand in 2011. The law is a response to the Supreme Court's ruling in ''Hamed & Ors v. R'',〔(''Hamed & Ors v. R'' (2011) NZSC 101 )〕 and is intended to legalise surveillance ruled unlawful by the courts.
==Background==
On 2 September 2011 the Supreme Court of New Zealand issued its ruling in the case of ''Hamed & Ors v. R'', ruling that some evidence obtained by video surveillance of suspects in the 2007 New Zealand anti-terror raids was gathered unlawfully and was inadmissible. Following the ruling, police dismissed charges against thirteen of the seventeen remaining suspects. On 19 September the New Zealand government announced that it had been advised that the decision meant that almost all covert video surveillance by police was unlawful and that it intended to legislate to reverse the decision.
The following week the government began to negotiate with other parties in an effort to gain backing for the bill. During the negotiation process a draft copy of the bill was leaked by the Labour Party via its blog ''Red Alert''.
The proposed bill was criticised by lawyers, civil libertarians, and the media, and by the Mana, Māori and Green parties. The Labour and ACT parties agreed to support the bill only to select committee. This was sufficient for the bill to be introduced. An attempt by the Labour Party to compromise by using clauses from the Search and Surveillance Bill was rejected by the government as "legislative field surgery".
抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』
■ウィキペディアで「Video Camera Surveillance (Temporary Measures) Act 2011」の詳細全文を読む
スポンサード リンク
| 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース |
Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.
|
|